Sting runs a jazz nightclub in cold and rainy neo-noir Newcastle upon Tyne, England. Apparently he's from up that way. He hires down-and-out-but-still-living-OK Sean Bean (making this a jag from Ronin) notionally to clean the place but really as a motor for the plot. Bean in turn meets-cute waitress and escort (?) Melanie Griffith. She's somehow attached to generic shady American businessman Tommy Lee Jones who is in town for America week. He proves incapable of making Sting an offer he cannot refuse but they come to terms anyway. Some comic and musical relief is provided by a Polish jazz band. There's an undertow of Irish-style violence; of course the Poles cop it in the neck when the US and UK go at it.
Mike Figgis wrote and directed. Apparently his first feature. The first half is a bit dreamy, a bit daft and somewhat fun. The second half gets serious and violent, retaining the style but souring the mood. Some wanton sexy filler destroys momentum as things move towards the inevitable. Everyone does OK and the cinematography is sound. I liked the editing. The music is often more interesting than the images. There's some vintage make-Britain-great-again rhetoric in the middle from the blonded mayor.
Roger Ebert: three-and-a-half stars. A Critic's Pick by Janet Maslin. It's OK but their praise is over the top.
Written and directed by David Mamet. A heist flick! I guess people were more gullible before 9/11 and omnipresent internet scams but really, come on, Campbell Scott plays a sap. This is difficult to accept as he's developed "The Process" to extract untold gazillions from somewhere for the generic office space company in NYC headed by Ben Gazarra, and any such money funnel that I've ever had awareness of requires at least some minimal rat cunning. But Mamet is surrounded by cupidity and that's all he can think about.
Rebecca Pidgeon (Mamet's wife) is tasked with capturing Scott's sexual interest with some vintage repetitive Mamet dialogue. I admired her commitment and wish she'd succeeded, and at something more worthwhile. Steve Martin plays a rich man, dramatically, humorlessly and ultimately ineffectually. P.T. Anderson regular Ricky Jay has all the weariness in the world. The ending left me hanging: was Gazzara in on it too? Was it turtles all the way down or did Takeo Matsushita really work for the FBI? If only Mamet had been as all-in as his wife.
Roger Ebert: three-and-a-half stars. I guess he felt this was a rug honestly pulled whereas I felt the misdirection was clunky and dated. A Critic's Pick by Janet Maslin. Mametese indeed. Hitchcockian. It put me in mind of Hal Hartley's far more successful artificiality.
An idle bit of Robert Altman completism. Clyde Hayes adapted raw material provided by John Grisham. Kenneth Branagh leads as an invincible attorney/pants man in Georgia who has separated from Famke Janssen. His office factotum Daryl Hannah is still putting up a fight. Private dick Robert Downey Jr. just marks time in various bars, waiting for the MCU.
For prima facie spurious reasons (fishnets!) Embeth Davidtz drives Branagh into maximal lust which causes him to get stupid in having her father Robert Duvall committed. All of this is so dumb — I regularly wanted to throw the movie across the room — that I mostly just waited for the twist. Tom Berenger's minor role as Davidtz's husband provides some early hints, and if he'd made any use of his boat's Chekhovian device we could have all finished up sooner. I did not understand the climax at all: surely everybody has their trust issues by then and yet they're still credulous and playing some other game.
Overall it was as if Altman had forgotten how to make a movie. There is little to no overlapping dialogue and we just follow Branagh around in a very linear manner. The soundtrack by Mark Isham is very obtrusive and often more intense than the action. The juxtaposition with Hurricane Geraldo is farcical.
Roger Ebert: three stars. A Critic's Pick by Janet Maslin. Not based on a novel. "Describing himself as 'a little toasted,' the actor [Downey Jr] is seen drinking heavily and even nodding out from time to time, with art mirroring life all too noticeably."
Directed by John Frankenheimer from a story by J.D. Zeik that was bent into shape by David Mamet trading as Richard Weisz (says IMDB). And what a mess it is.
We're dropped into a meetup at a bar somewhere (Paris?) that gets the principals together. It is unclear what Robert De Niro is good for; initially he acts like a boss then later as a producer and even later the operator with all the skills. Jean Reno is similar but French. Stellan Skarsgård is the Russian computer genius, and we all know you can't trust those ex-KGB blokes so why do these people? Perhaps we're supposed to think that Natasha McElhone is torn between De Niro's manliness and her revolutionary Irish cause. (She's wide eyed and flat and looks too much like Meryl Streep but is of course irresistible). Sean Bean's role is perplexing: initially strong he's shown to be a faker of no consequence. Skipp Sudduth is their driver.
The setup is essentially a heist but the bulk of the runtime is in two car chases: one in Paris and the other in or near Nice. I had no idea what was supposed to be going on until things got somewhat retconned in the final minutes. That may have been due to not having subtitles for the French bits but I'm pretty sure those did not matter. There are just too many plot holes and general incoherencies along the way. I never gave a damn about what was in the case.
Roger Ebert: three stars. "The movie is essentially bereft of a plot." And more fatally: "'I never walk into a place I don't know how to walk out of,' says De Niro, who spends most of the rest of the movie walking into places he doesn’t know how to walk out of." A Critic's Pick by Janet Maslin. She seems to have forgotten about Mann's Heat of 1995.
Kindle. Translated by Natasha Wimmer. An imagining of the day Hernán Cortés encountered Moctezuma II. The characters serve mostly to explore the Aztec capital Tenochtitlan and the culture clash between the imperials/conquerors. Most of the book is setup, explaining how we got here and to an extent the prevailing politics. Most of the plot development occurs in the final pages where a drug reveals how (future) history actually went. It was hard to parse what impact Cortés's account of Christianity had on Moctezuma or its import to this story. Psychedelics feature prominently. There are two princesses who lack volition and much characterisation beyond their regality.
I enjoyed it on its own terms; more familiarity with the actual history may've yielded a richer experience but probably also an oversensitivity to Enrigue's infidelities and confabulations. It sort-of lays the groundwork for Francis Spufford's alt-history Cahokia Jazz (with some points of similarly like the emperor-of-the-sun and mayor-of-the-moon for instance). The horses here stand in for the variant strain of smallpox there.
Dwight Garner: quotidian. Quite. Anthony Cummins. Adam Mars-Jones summarises at vast length. (I don't think ant colonies are hierarchical.) Goodreads did not exactly love it.
And yet more Burt Lancaster completism. Directed by John Frankenheimer from an adaptation by Guy Trosper of Thomas E. Gaddis's bowderlized biography/hagiography of "Birdman of Alcatraz" Robert Stroud. Oscar noms but no gongs went to Lancaster, fellow jailbird Telly Savalas, mother Thelma Ritter and cinematographer Burnett Guffrey.
We meet Lancaster imprisoned in Leavenworth, Kansas for killing a man. Soon enough he kills a screw on the possibly that a small infraction would deny him a visit from his mother. The man did not like uncertainty! Ending up in solitary forevermore (on a technicality after a publicity campaign helped him evade execution) he gets into birding: sparrows and canaries. With plenty of time on his hands in a mind-bogglingly lax Federal Penitentiary, he does some apparently valuable research on avians and rattles off a few amusing lines ("You're all got, you little runt." to his new bestie sparrow) as he is caught in some semi-catch-22 prison regulations: the Bolshevik prison operators try to appropriate the profits of his bird remedies! The horror. But he's having none of that and his cell remains impeccably clean throughout.
While the first half is a bit amusing the second is solemn, almost humourless, and leans into far too much exposition. Lancaster's engagements with nemesis warden Karl Malden are all very humanistic and civil, at least until we get to a pitched (but entirely stock) battle against D block on Alcatraz.
Overall Lancaster needed to heighten the distinction between the young psycho and the aged, mellow intellectual; he's fine with the latter but couldn't locate an inner Dennis Hopper. So while he is better here than in the first part of his career I don't bracket this with the vastly better works that started with The Leopard (1963).
A. H. Weiler at the New York Times. All the details at Wikipedia.
